OK
 
CULTURE : DRIVE : ENVIRONMENT : MEDIA : NEIGHBORHOODS : POWER : L.A.VISION :: [FAQ] .
LAVoice.org
. user.php .
Santiveri
.
  Welcome, !   Feb 09, 2010 - 09:05 AM  
.
   Login to
COMMENT or POST
.




 


 Log in Problems?
 New User? Sign Up!
.
   SEARCH
.
Google
Web lavoice.org

.
   Main Menu
.
.
   Who's Online
.
There are 34 unlogged users and 0 registered users online.

You can log-in or register for a user account here.
.
   LAVoice Archives
.
CULTURE
DRIVE
ENVIRONMENT
MEDIA
NEIGHBORHOODS
POWER
.
   Past Articles
.
Older articles
.
.
 
  Doggedly, Moore Pushes His Image
1829 Reads
 
 
If there's one thing Walter Moore has going for him - an anti-immigration Republican slaving away for the dream of becoming mayor of one of the bluest. most immigrant-populous cities in the nation - it's chutzpah.

Largely shut out of the L.A. mediasphere, ridiculed in private (to me at least) by journalists you'd respect, and perennially forbidden a seat at the debate table, Moore has no qualms about banging his pneumatic sense of entitlement against the doors of the public arena over and over and over ... and over.

The Valley-based attorney's latest email broadside says he sued the Alliance of Neighborhood Councils for an explanation of why he should be excluded from the debates - despite an opinion from the City Attorney's office that the councils alliance must invite all mayoral candidates to the mikes - not just the five who were able to raise at least $150,000 in donations from at least 300 donors ...
POWER
Today I filed a lawsuit in L.A. County Superior Court regarding my exclusion from the upcoming televised debates.

As many of you know, the two 90-minute televised mayoral debates are scheduled for February 7 and 28, 2005. One of the sponsors is "the Alliance of Neighborhood Councils." The City Attorney has issued a formal opinion letter, based on federal and state constitutional law, stating that Neighborhood Councils holding a debate must invite all candidates, not just some of them. Despite the letter and the law, "the Alliance of Neighborhood Councils" has invited some of the candidates -- five, to be exact -- and excluded me, Walter Moore.

"The Alliance of Neighborhood Councils" explained its decision to exclude me by claiming, among other things, the following: "The Ethics Commission defines a 'viable' candidate for Mayor as someone who has raised $150,000 in contributions from individuals in amounts of less than $500." In fact, the Ethics Commission does not have a definition of "viable." Rather, "viable" is a matter of opinion, not law.

Through the lawsuit, I am asking the Court, among other things, either to put me in the debate, or to require the sponsors of the debate to disclose on TV: i) that the so-called "Alliance of Neighborhood Councils" is not an alliance of Neighborhood Councils at all, and, indeed, does not include a single Neighborhood Council; ii) that the five candidates participating were selected because they each raised $150,000 from contributors; and iii) that a sixth candidate, Walter Moore, deposited $100,000 of his own money into his campaign, but was excluded because he did not raise $150,000 from third parties.

You should, of course, not jump to any conclusions based on the foregoing information or the filing of a lawsuit. The defendants are entitled to explain their side of the story, and to try to justify their decision to exclude me from the debates. We'll leave it to the Court to decide who's right. In the meantime, however, I wanted you to know that I am taking action to protect my rights as a candidate, and your rights as voters, to a full and fair debate, not a debate limited to candidates who have raised $150,000 from donors.

And, though some of you will doubtless have many questions about the litigation, please don't bombard me with them. I generally never comment on pending litigation. I only made an exception for this e-mail because this particular lawsuit involves the public interest, and because I want you to know I am fighting for what I believe is right. I will keep you posted on the lawsuit as events develop.

Cordially,
Walter Moore
L.A.'s Next Mayor
The balls this guy has. Great big clankin' brass ones.

Sorry, that was overly cynical. I'm actually with Moore on this one; as one of more than half a dozen "unrecognized" candidates who garnered enough signatures to get onto the ballot, he has just as much a right to the podium as the five guys who have amassed great gobs of money solely for the purpose of publicity.

L.A. still isn't a plutocracy, last I looked.


Send this story to someone  
 
 
Posted by: mack_reed on Wednesday, January 26, 2005 - 11:30 PM  
 
Doggedly, Moore Pushes His Image | Log-in or register a new user account | Comments
  
Comments are statements made by the person that posted them.
They do not necessarily represent the opinions of the site editor.
.
   Advertisements
.

blog advertising is good for you

.
   Blogs Beyond
.
.
   RSS
.

Add to My Yahoo!
FeedBurner
.
.
. . .



You can syndicate our news by linking to the file backend.php

Feedback on the contents of LAvoice.org
should be submitted by clicking "comments" on the pertinent story.

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | |

Creative Commons License
All words and images on LAvoice.org
are licensed under a Creative Commons License.
LAVoice.org was created at factoid labs

PUBLISHERS: Ryan Knoll and Scott Olin Schmidt (2007 - ); Mack Reed, 2002-2007

This web site was made with PostNuke, a web portal system written in PHP.
PostNuke is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.