 |
 |
|
| |
NYC to LA: Don't Let Villaraigosa Run LAUSD
|
4125 Reads
|
|
|
 |
| |
Look: the L.A. Unified School District is a mess - 53% dropout rate, low test scores, multi-million-dollar white-elephant school projects - but is it wise to back Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa's plan for the city to take over?
Actually, no, it's a very bad idea.
So say activists in New York and Chicago's city-run school districts - who are warning warn that mayors tend to act like emperors, ignoring the needs of the peasants below while pushing their own personal agendas for reform ...
|
|
They're circulating a petition among Chicago and NYC parents urging parents not to support Villaraigosa's takeover plan:The letter contends that mayor-controlled school systems lack accountability.
"The mayors of our cities and their appointees now feel empowered to ignore the priorities of parents, teachers and other stakeholders in the system, and have imposed radical changes from above without reference to research, experience or conditions on the ground," states the letter. "This has resulted in more chaos, violence and worsening opportunities for many of our students."
Leonie Haimson, a New York parent activist, drafted the letter with Julie Woestehoff, head of Chicago-based Parents United for Responsible Education. The two are working to gather signatures from parents in both cities before delivering the letter to parent groups in Los Angeles.
Haimson, who runs the group Class Size Matters, said New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg's recent refusal to ease a ban on student cell phones, despite widespread insistence among parents, exemplified a need for more checks and balances.
"We just wanted to warn L.A. that mayoral control should not be added to the problems that we share," she said. Solutions? There may be no one solution.
Charters and magnets have been popping up all over Los Angeles over the past 10 years - as if we could cure metastatic cancer of the entire LAUSD by transplanting a few healthy lymph nodes. For their pupils, they prove a wonderful alternative to the just-LAUSD schools.
But instead of helping cure the system, they just wind up siphoning off the students whose parents are engaged and/or wealthy enough in time, money and interest to bolster the still-small public budgets in the charters and magnets.
Green Dot Public Schools has opened five new charter high schools in L.A., and just got a $6-million grant to overhaul the horribly troubled Jefferson High.
But it's doubtful Green Dot can remake the entire school system and even if it could, do we want a private corporation running our public schools?
Seriously - I haven't seen a compelling argument yet for Villaraigosa taking over - or a more comprehensive solution. Somebody help me out here.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Posted by: Mack_Reed on Friday, June 02, 2006 - 09:53 AM
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|